birding logo

Exploring birds and birding in popular culture.

Tag: uk

  • ‘Birds of the High Arctic’ (Song, 2014)

    Writer: David Gray
    Performer: David Gray
    Country of Origin: U.K.

    Let’s begin with a little disclaimer:

    Where David Gray is concerned, I’m possessed of an inordinate degree of bias. I discovered Gray’s music in the summer of 2001. I was perusing the DVD section at a music & movie store in Halifax, Nova Scotia when ‘Sail Away’ began playing over the store’s sound system. I had never heard anything quite like this song. It was – in my humble opinion – the most perfect fusion of pop, folk, and electronic music I had ever experienced. And I was hooked for life.

    Today, I’m perfectly happy to admit that he’s my all-time favourite musical artist.

    Ok, now that that’s out of the way, let’s talk about the sublime ‘Birds of the High Arctic’.


    This tune appeared on Gray’s tenth studio album, Mutineers, released in 2014.

    mutineers album
    The album cover for David Gray’s Mutineers (2014).

    One of the really interesting things about this album – aside from how good it is lol – is that ‘Birds of the High Arctic’ is just one of three bird-related titles. There’s also ‘As the Crow Flies’ and ‘Gulls’, both of which I’ll probably get into in future posts.

    If you’re unfamiliar with Gray’s music – and I assume you are – then you might be interested to know that his entire musical catalog is punctuated with bird references. Not to mention references to nature in general. Gray is an avowed lover of the natural world, and he’s especially fond of birds. So it’s not all that surprising that his music is so nature- and bird-centric.

    I’ll circle back to this topic in a bit, though. Right now I want to dig into what ‘Birds of the High Arctic’ is about.

    Here’s the first verse:

    Baby say it isn’t true
    You were never there
    It wasn’t you
    It’s more than I can do
    To try and keep it shiny new
    The gap just opens up
    Between the words we like to use
    And the thing that’s seen
    Seen through your eyes now darling
    In blue distances calling
    Like the birds of the high arctic

    Before reading on, I’d recommend giving the full song a listen. As provocative as the lyrics are, they represent only a fraction of what makes this song so achingly beautiful. There are several live versions of the song floating around, all of which are quite excellent, but I’d stick with the original album version for the time being.

    Here’s an audio-only YouTube link. Crank it!


    So what exactly is this song about?

    Actually, wait. That’s the wrong question.

    How about:

    What is my personal interpretation of the song?

    Yeah, that sounds sooo much better. There are no right or wrong answers when you frame it that way. Which is precisely the way it works with all great art.

    To begin – because I think this is key – who are the birds of the high Arctic? You know, we aren’t talking Panama here. Or the wilds of Africa. We’re talking about the earth’s upper latitudes. Where it tends to be fairly cold and icy year-round. And where birds are generally few and far between.

    There are plenty of avian species that spend at least part of year in the Arctic. Redpolls and Dark-eyed Juncos are two fine examples. But there are only a handful of birds that we tend to associate almost exclusively with the Arctic. The Rock Ptarmigan and Snowy Owl are perhaps the two best-known. There’s also the Snow Bunting, Ivory Gull, Arctic Tern, Black Guillemot, Gyrfalcon, and a few others.

    The birds of the Arctic are a quiet and unassuming lot. Whether they’re prey or a predator, they aren’t trying to grab anyone’s attention. Remaining as inconspicuous as possible is kind of their thing.  You might hear them occasionally – if you try really hard – but spotting one across the endless fields of snow and ice will always be something of a challenge.

    Which is where I think Gray is coming from when he writes In blue distances calling/Like the birds of the high arctic. The metaphor is meant to emphasize the distance (i.e. the gap that has opened up) between the song’s protagonist and their significant other. The lyrics seem to suggest that said protagonist has inadvertently discovered that their partner has perhaps been unfaithful.

    The third verse…

    They’re calling
    Like the birds of the high arctic
    This darling
    For the light in your eyes sparked it
    Two sheets to the wind

    …adds another layer to the song’s themes.

    I’m not aware of any metaphorical meaning behind ‘two sheets to the wind’ other than describing someone who is moderately drunk. A quick Google search turned up no heretofore unknown uses of the expression.

    I don’t think the metaphorical meaning makes a whole lot of sense in the context of the song, anyway. I would argue that Gray is borrowing the original literal meaning of the phrase and using it to illustrate a state of being. Here’s how Dictionary.com explains the nautical origin of the phrase:

    ‘The sheet is the line that controls the sails on a ship. If the line is not secured, the sail flops in the wind, and the ship loses headway and control.’

    That totally tracks with the rest of the song’s lyrics. Thematically, I believe Gray is ultimately describing a relationship that has disintegrated. Or one that has veered very far off course. The protagonist is left feeling lost and disoriented.

    And the sound of birds calling across the lonely, desolate, and blue-tinted Arctic landscape? It perfectly describes the sense of distance and disconnection that has consumed the couple.

    Well, that’s my take on it. Maybe I’m wrong. Or maybe I’m right. Who can say for sure? Maybe the birds of the high Arctic.


    Ok, one last thing. I said I’d get back to this – Gray’s relationship with nature – so here it is.

    Based solely on social media posts he’s made over the years, I kind of knew all this. However, I hadn’t come across any official statements he’s made on the topic until very recently. This is from a piece that appeared in an April 2025 edition of the UK’s The Telegraph. He’s referring here to going for walks when he has downtime:

    “I want to hear the nature around me and be completely connected. I’m so wired to nature it’s a time when I’m very present. I’m very in the moment. I’m living the landscape, the birds, the calls, the place, the sound of the wind through the grass, the water. The whole thing is living inside me.”

    It’s a little bit astonishing to read that. It could just as easily have come out of my own mouth. It’s really no wonder that I’m so drawn to his music.

    Cheers all!

    P.S. Here’s one of those occasional birds of the Arctic, a Redpoll:

    redpoll b
    A Redpoll (Acanthis flammea) in the snow. Photographed in my yard in Sackville, New Brunswick in February 2021. © 2026 by Pop Culture Birding.
  • ‘Hamnet’ (Film, 2025): Pop Culture Birding Goofs

    ‘Hamnet’ (Film, 2025): Pop Culture Birding Goofs

    Director: Chloé Zhao
    Writer: Chloé Zhao, Maggie O’Farrell (screenplay); Maggie O’Farrell (novel)
    Country of Origin: U.K./U.S.A.

    One could possibly write an entire book on the glut of movies and television shows that have mis-represented birds in one way or another over the past ninety-plus years. Not simply in terms of outlandish and inaccurate bird behavior (e.g. Hitchcock’s The Birds), but also in less insidious ways.

    Things like:

    The use of a Red-tailed Hawk call anytime a Bald Eagle appears on screen. Or a bird song or call in a geographic setting where those birds would never actually be found.

    These minor annoyances (to a birder, anyway) continue right into the present day with the release of Chloé Zhao’s Oscar-nominee Hamnet (2025).

    I won’t go into the film itself to any degree. I thought it was generally quite good, with only a few hairline cracks to nitpick about. It’s certainly not the most cheerful film of the year, and in that regard, it’s a genuinely heavy experience. But I love a good sad or melancholia-fueled cinematic vision more than most, so I was perfectly fine to take on all that weight.

    One of the key stories explored throughout the film is the bond between Agnes Shakespeare, née Hathaway – played by Jessie Buckley – and the natural world. For my money, it’s the thematic thread that effectively holds the narrative together.

    In today’s world of disconnection and apathy, this particular topic is becoming increasingly relevant. To see it play out on the big screen in the ways it does in Hamnet was a little surprising, to be honest. But a very welcome surprise, obviously.

    Perhaps just a tad bit unfortunately, however, this theme happens to be the source of my only real complaint with the film. If you’ve watched it, or maybe if you’ve only seen the trailer or glanced at the poster…

    poster
    Theatrical poster for Hamnet (2025).

    …you’ll likely know that Hamnet features a hawk. Agnes’ sort-of ‘pet’ hawk. You can see it at the bottom right on the poster, but here’s a shot from the film, in case you’re in doubt:

    hawk image
    Jessie Buckley in Hamnet, holding her ‘pet’ hawk.

    Though only appearing in the film for a few minutes, the hawk does add some important thematic value to the story and the character arcs. At no point in the film is the species of hawk mentioned. It’s simply referred to as a ‘hawk’.

    As we all know, of course, discerning the exact species of hawk used in the film is ridiculously easy. Given our current technology and resources. Well, as it turns out, it’s a Harris’s Hawk (Parabuteo unicinctus).

    Here’s a range map for the Harris’s:

    range map
    Range map for the Harris’s Hawk, courtesy of AllAboutBirds.org.

    So…their range covers a bit of North America…a bit of Central and South America…and…that’s it.

    They aren’t found in England. Or anywhere in Europe, for that matter. In fact, you won’t find one anywhere outside of the Americas. Not now and not in the late sixteenth century, when Hamnet takes place.

    So what gives? Why a Harris’s and not a raptor native to England? Why not a Northern Goshawk? Or a Red Kite?

    Well, as far as I can tell, the reason was one of practicality for the filmmakers. According to the CornellLab’s All About Birds page on the Harris’s Hawk, “[it’s] social nature and relative ease with humans has made it popular among falconers and in education programs.”

    Ok, so I guess I kind of get it. They’re easy to work with. Which is certainly not true of most raptors. So…fine. It is what it is. Sure, it’s another pop culture birding flub, but I suppose I can live with it. I mean, what else am I (or any other birder) going to do? Write angry letters?

    I don’t have any photos of a Harris’s Hawk. In fact, I’ve never seen one. Not yet. But here’s a Red-tailed Hawk, the official vocal stand-in for the Bald Eagle in virtually every film ever made:

    red tailed hawk
    A Red-tailed Hawk (Buteo jamaicensis) stalking my backyard in December 2025. © 2026 by Pop Culture Birding.